Family caregivers of those with cancer: quality of life outcomes from a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To conduct a secondary analysis focused on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among caregivers engaged in a 12-week complementary therapy sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) of reflexology and/or meditative practices (MP), to manage cancer patients' symptoms. METHODS: In this SMART, patient-caregiver dyads were initially randomized to 4 weeks of caregiver-delivered reflexology for the patient (N = 150), MP with the patient (N = 150), or control (N = 47). After 4 weeks, dyads with patients not improving on fatigue (non-responders, n = 69 to reflexology and n = 57 to MP) were re-randomized to continue the same therapy or add the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks. Week-12 caregiver HRQOL was measured using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Profile-29 and the Caregiver Reaction Assessment Tool (CRAT) for caregiver burden; scores were analyzed using general linear models. RESULTS: In the comparison of 4 adaptive intervention sequences: reflexology for 8 weeks, reflexology for 4 weeks followed by MP for 4 weeks if no response to reflexology, MP for 8 weeks, and MP for 4 weeks followed by reflexology for 4 weeks if no response to MP, there were no differences in PROMIS-29 scores. However, CRAT domains of impact on schedule, family support, and finances worsened when adding reflexology after the first 4 weeks of MP. The CRAT domain of health worsened by adding either intervention compared to continuing the same one. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware that caregiver engagement in more than one complementary therapy may increase caregiver burden in some domains but not affect other HRQOL domains. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02759146.

Burden and psychological symptoms among caregivers of patients with solid tumor cancers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate factors associated with burden reported by caregivers of people undergoing treatment for solid tumor cancers. METHODS: A secondary analysis of baseline data collected in a cancer symptom management trial was conducted guided by the Organizing Framework for Caregiver Interventions. A total of 349 caregivers completed the Caregiver Reaction Assessment Tool evaluating caregiver burden; Bayliss Comorbidity Tool; and PROMIS-29 version1.0-Anxiety and Depression Short Forms. Multivariable linear models were used to examine the associations of Caregiver Reaction Assessment Tool subscales (caregiver self-esteem, family support, financial, schedule, and health burden) with caregiver sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, anxiety, and depression. RESULTS: The majority of caregivers were female and spouses/partners who resided with the patient. Being female, Asian, a spouse of the patient, employed, and having a higher level of anxiety and depressive symptoms were significantly associated with lower caregiver self-esteem, and higher perceived schedule and health burden. Caregiver anxiety and depressive symptoms were also significantly associated with lack of family support and higher financial burden. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should consider factors that contribute to higher perceived burden for caregivers when they are engaged in home-based supportive care for patients undergoing cancer treatment.

Informal caregiver burden for solid tumour cancer patients: a review and future directions.

OBJECTIVE: Recent shifts in healthcare delivery and treatment for solid tumour cancer patients have modified the responsibilities of informal caregivers. The objective of this study was to: review informal caregiver burden factors and determine areas where future research is needed. METHODS: The Arksey and O'Malley's framework and a modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were used in conducting this review. Research literature was systematically searched using five-electronic databases, including PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane, CINAHL, and SCOPUS, and reference lists from included studies to identify publications since 2010. Inclusion criterion was caregivers providing home-based care to a cancer patient. RESULTS: The search yielded 43 eligible papers of 2119 reviewed, including articles from over 17 countries. Caregiver physical and psychological health, financial strain, and social isolation, as well as limited family and social support continued to be important factors contributing to high levels of caregiver burden. Less recognised factors affecting higher burden included caregivers' self-esteem, male gender, and the dynamic nature of cancer treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This review updates the state of the science on informal caregiver burden when caring for patients with solid tumour cancers and informs future interventions on how to reduce this burden.

Expanding Application of the Long-Term Quality of Life Instrument to the Population of Women Undergoing Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Long-Term Quality of Life (LTQL) instrument was designed for female cancer survivors who have completed treatment and includes an existential spirituality subscale that is omitted in many other quality of life scales. Women with advanced breast cancer are now living longer, while also expressing greater spiritual concerns. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to test the psychometric properties of the LTQL among women undergoing treatment of advanced breast cancer. METHODS: This secondary analysis was based on a sample of 385 women. Validity was evaluated using a confirmatory factor analysis and associations with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α for each subscale of the LTQL. RESULTS: The mean age was 56 years, 84% of participants were white, and 69% had metastasis. Model fit indices for the confirmatory factor analysis were acceptable, with the root mean square error of approximation of 0.076 (90% confidence interval, 0.071-0.081) and a comparative fit index of 0.91. The LTQL subscale scores were significantly correlated with the subscales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer of similar conceptual content. Internal consistency reliability for the subscales ranged from 0.80 to 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: The factor structure of the LTQL was consistent with previous findings in long-term female cancer survivors. The instrument has adequate psychometric properties for use among women with advanced breast cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The LTQL can be used to assess the physical, psychosocial, and existential spiritual domains of quality of life among women with advanced breast cancer as well as in long-term female cancer survivors.

Parental acceptance of HPV vaccines in Chiang Mai, Thailand.

OBJECTIVE: To identify variables associated with the acceptance of HPV vaccination among Thai parents/primary caregivers. METHODS: The present prospective cross-sectional study recruited the parents/caregivers of female adolescents aged 12-18 years from schools in Chiang Mai, Thailand, between January 1 and February 29, 2016. A four-part questionnaire was distributed to assess demographics, HPV vaccine acceptance, knowledge, and beliefs toward HPV and cervical cancer. Predictors of HPV vaccine acceptance were determined by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study enrolled 331 parents; more than half (195 [61.1%]) had heard of HPV vaccines. Their knowledge related to HPV and cervical cancer was moderate. A majority of parents (266/313 [85.0%]) indicated they would accept HPV vaccination if the costs were subsidized by the government. Acceptance of HPV vaccines was associated with perceived benefits of HPV vaccination (odds ratio [OR] 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.88), perceived susceptibility to disease (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.11-1.81), and household income (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.02-1.78). CONCLUSION: Parental beliefs have an important role in their acceptance to vaccinate their daughters. These potentially modifiable beliefs offer strategies for future interventions designed to increase uptake for future HPV vaccination campaigns.

Revisiting the Quality of Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Nursing Literature.

PURPOSE: To examine and update the literature on the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as reported in top nursing journals, based on manuscripts' adherence to the CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. DESIGN: Descriptive review of adherence of RCT manuscript to CONSORT guidelines. METHODS: Top 40 International Scientific Indexing (ISI) ranked nursing journals that published 20 or more RCTs between 2010 and 2014, were included in the study. Selected articles were randomly assigned to four reviewers who assessed the quality of the articles using the CONSORT checklist. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. FINDINGS: A total of 119 articles were included in the review. The mean CONSORT score significantly differed by journal but did not differ based on year of publication. The least consistently reported items included random allocation, who randomly assigned participants and whether those administering the interventions were blinded to group assignment. CONCLUSIONS: Although progress has been made, there is still room for improvement in the quality of RCT reporting in nursing journals. Special attention must be paid to how adequately studies adhere to the CONSORT prior to publication in nursing journals. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Evidence from (RCTs) are thought to provide the best evidence for evaluating the impact of treatments and interventions by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Since the evidence may be used for the development of clinical practice guidelines, it is critical that RCTs be designed, conducted, and reported appropriately and precisely.